Gerard licensed his models under BY-NC-SA, and the new GRTux hangar had the models under the same license. I opened this topic to discuss the licenses, not personal feelings. And FG is kinda worldwide project, so people you talk to online don't necessarily share your standards. This ugly little planet which we live on, has astonishing many and different cultures and standards are different.
#FLIGHTGEAR AIRCRAFT HANGAR SKIN#
Everybody get yourself a bit thicker skin and don't immediately feel offended.
I only saw eekpo expressing disappointment and from this, the whole thing escalated. Besides, I didn't see anyone accusing anyone of anything. Voudoun: I think, the most harmful thing to the FG community is, if such a small thing escalates because people start taking sides and a small, probably cultural misunderstanding, escalates into a fully fledged flamewar. StuartC: Understand that in ME culture there are maybe different standards about what politeness requires. That's no disrespect to you specifically. So my 2 cents:Įekpo: Understand that in Central Europe people tend to be more pragmatic and don't necessarily have the same standards about what's polite or not. I have spent some time in the Middle East and can understand how this whole situation came together. I would say, we have some cultural conflicts here. I think, the whole thing is escalating needlessly. and inform yourself about the different licence types and make sure you have understood them.
#FLIGHTGEAR AIRCRAFT HANGAR HOW TO#
That means: StuartC and FGUK may still modify and redistribute their version of your aircraft.īefore you create any aircraft and want to distribute it - read part 1 of this How to make an Aircraft. You don't have to be informed about any modification and derivative work! That's the OpenSource principle.Īll the models you have distributed until the licence change now will keep under the original licence and may be changed/modified and redistributed.īut your models changed after the licence change will be under the new licence and may not changed/modified and redistributed without your permission. has to redistributed under the same licence it allows derivative works and modifications So there is no need and no duty and no rule to inform the original author about a modification!Īs long the licences choosed states that: You had a a licence which allowed derivative work. Idea why your remark has been deleted, but maybe exactly due to this:
0 kommentar(er)
